Preliminary validity study comparing the prone lumbar hypermobility test against the prone instability test*
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54571/ajee.486Palabras clave:
QuiropracticaResumen
Abstract:
Objective: The Prone Instability Test (PIT) is an established orthopaedic test that predicts the probability of low back pain patients responding positively to a spinal stabilization program (.71 sensitivity, .57 specificity for PIT). This preliminary study suggests the Prone Lumbar Hypermobility Test (PLHT) as an effective alternative to the PIT that is more suitable for a wider population due to the modified patient positioning. In contrast to the PIT, the PLHT has the patient's entire body supported by the examination table. This is hypothesized to maximize patient comfort while still maintaining clinical effectiveness for the chronic low back pain population. The purpose of this preliminary study is to determine whether the PLHT is comparable to the PIT in diagnostic effectiveness when predicting the benefits of stabilization interventions.
Methods: To compare the clinical effectiveness of the PLHT to the PIT, each subject underwent parts I and II (relaxed and contracted) of each test (PIT and PLHT). 36 subjects received both parts of PIT and PLHT (in a randomized order). Subjects assumed each of the four positions and 4 kg/cm2 of pressure was applied directly on the skin over the L4 spinous process, using an algometer. The subjects verbally indicated perceived pain following each of the 4 positions.
Results: Of the 36 participants included in the study, 23 participants had a negative PIT and a negative PLHT and six had a positive PIT and a positive PLHT. Three participants had a positive PIT and negative PLHT and four had a positive PLHT and negative PIT. This indicates that the PIT and PLHT have a statistically significant level of agreement.
Conclusions: This study found that the PLHT is valid in identifying negative results in the predicted negative population, as well as positive results in the predicted positive population. For future investigations, a larger sample size is advantageous - particularly with an evenly distributed and accurate sample of positive and negative participants. This will more accurately determine the validity of the PLHT and broaden the application of the PLHT to the population for which the test is aimed to identify in clinical practice.
Descargas
Citas
Martin B, Deyo R, Mirza S, Turner J, Comstock B, Sullivan S, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA: Journal Of The American Medical Association [serial on the Internet]. (2008, Feb 13), [cited February 11, 2017]; 299(6): 656-664. Available from: CINAHL Plus with Full Text.
Deyo R, Mirza S, Martin B. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine (03622436) [serial on the Internet]. (2006, Nov), [cited February 20, 2017]; 31(23): 2724-2727. Available from: CINAHL Plus with Full Text. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000244618.06877.cd
oy D et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014Jun;73(6):968-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Seattle, WA: IHME, 2018. 5. Eric Hurwitz, Kristi Randhawa, Hainan Yu, Pierre Cote, Scott Haldeman The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of the global burden of low backand neck pain studies European Spine Journal (2018) 27 (Suppl 6):5796- 5801 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5432-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5432-9
Hall H, McIntosh G, Boyle C. Clinical Study: Effectiveness of a low back pain classification system. The Spine Journal [serial on the Internet]. (2009, Jan 1), [cited February 15, 2017]; 9648-657. Available from: ScienceDirect.
Fritz JM, George S The use of a classification approach to identify subgroups of patients with acute low back pain. Interrater reliability and short-term treatment outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jan;25(1):106-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200001010-00018
Fischer A. Algometry in diagnosis of musculoskeletal pain and evaluation of treatment outcome: an update...presented at the symposium, 'Diagnosis and Treatment of Muscle Pain Syndromes: Myofascial, Spasm, Fibromyalgia' an official Satellite Symposium to the 8th World Congress on Pain held on August 23-25, 1996 at the University of British Columbia Conference Center in Vancouver, Canada. Journal Of Musculoskeletal Pain [serial on the Internet]. (1998, Mar), [cited March 1, 2017]; 6(1): 5-32. Available from: CINAHL Plus with Full Text. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J094v06n01_02
Kinser A, Sands W, Stone M. Reliability and validity of a pressure algometer. Journal Of Strength & Conditioning Research (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) [serial on the Internet]. (2009, Jan), [cited March 1, 2017]; 23(1): 312-314. Available from: CINAHL Plus with Full Text. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818f051c
Sackett D, Haynes R. The architecture of diagnostic research. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) [serial on the Internet]. (2002, Mar 2), [cited March 1, 2017]; 324(7336): 539-541. Available from: MEDLINE with Full Text. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7336.539
Tractenberg R, Yumoto F, Jin S, Morris J, Tractenberg R, Morris J, et al. Sample size requirements for training to a kappa agreement criterion on clinical dementia ratings. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders [serial on the Internet]. (2010, July), [cited March 1, 2017]; 24(3): 264-268. Available from: CINAHL Plus with Full Text. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181d489c6
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use Fourth Edition. Oxford University Press: Toronto.
Magee D. Orthopedic physical assessment [monograph on the Internet]. [place unknown]: St. Louis, MO : Saunders Elsevier, 2008.; 2008. [cited February 18, 2017]. Available from: CMCC Library Catalogue (OPAC).
Ferrari S, Manni T, Bonetti F, Hugo Villafañe J, Vanti C. A literature review of clinical tests for lumbar instability in low back pain: validity and applicability in clinical practice. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies [serial on the Internet]. (2015, Apr), [cited February 5, 2017]; 23(1): 1-12. Available from: CINAHL Plus with Full Text. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-015-0058-7
Hicks GE, Fritz JM, DeLitto A, McGill SM Preliminary Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Determining Which Patients With Low Back Pain Will Respond to a Stabilization Exercise Program Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 86, Issue 9, September 2005, Pages 1753-1762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.033
Abbott J, McCane B, Herbison P, Moginie G, Chapple C, Hogarty T. Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders [serial on the Internet]. (2005, Nov 7), [cited February 9, 2017]; 656. Available from: MEDLINE with Full Text. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-56
McGill S. Low back disorders: evidence-based prevention and rehabilitation [monograph on the Internet]. [place unknown]: Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2016; 2007. [cited March 1, 2017]. Available from: CMCC Library Catalogue (OPAC).
Vear H. Chiropractic standards of practice and quality of care. Aspen Publishing Company [serial on the Internet]. (1992, Jan 1), [cited March 1, 2017]; Available from: AMED - The Allied and Complementary Medicine Database.
Pecos-Martín D, de Melo Aroeira A, Verás Silva R, Martínez de Tejada Pozo G, Rodríguez Solano L, Falla D, et al. Immediate effects of thoracic spinal mobilisation on erector spinae muscle activity and pain in patients with thoracic spine pain: a preliminary randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy [serial on the Internet]. (2017, Mar 1), [cited February 19, 2017]; 10390-97. Available from: ScienceDirect. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.10.016
Triano J, Schultz A. Loads transmitted during lumbosacral spinal manipulative therapy. Spine (03622436) [serial on the Internet]. (1997, Sep), [cited February 20, 2017]; 22(17): 1955-1964. Available from: CINAHL Plus with Full Text. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199709010-00003
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. La revista conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que se cite la autoría, la url, y la revista, y no se usen para fines comerciales.
3. Los autores están de acuerdo con la licencia de uso utilizada por la revista, con las condiciones de auto-archivo y con la política de acceso abierto.
4. En caso de reutilización de las obras publicadas debe mencionarse la existencia y especificaciones de la licencia de uso además de mencionar la autoría y fuente original de su publicación.
